Peiser's correspondence with Science
Contains a series of letters between Dr. Peiser and Science Magazine in which Dr. Peiser disputes an article saying that a review of publications on climate change shows that a "consensus" of scientists support anthropogenic global warming. Peiser's research shows the analysis is fatally flawed. Does Science publish the opposing view? No. First, the letter is "too long" then "well its on the internet so we won't publish it" In otherwords, Science is not interested in the "scientific method" when it results in data that doesn't support their preconceived notions.
Found on
No comments:
Post a Comment